Steps for Drafting a Payment Demand Notice & Complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act (India)

 

1. Legal Framework Understanding

   • Section 138 of the NI Act addresses the dishonor of cheques due to insufficient funds or other reasons.

   • Criminal Liability: Dishonor of a cheque under Section 138 is a criminal offense, punishable with imprisonment (up to 2 years) or a fine (up to twice the cheque amount), or both.

2. Issuing the Payment Demand Notice

   • Notice Content: Clearly mention the amount due, date of cheque, and that the cheque was dishonored.

   • Deadline: The notice should demand payment within 15 days from the date of receiving the notice.

   • Format: The notice must comply with the legal format and be professionally worded. Avoid using threatening or abusive language.

   • Delivery: The notice should be sent via registered post with acknowledgment and speed post to ensure proof of delivery.

3. Timing of Sending the Notice

   • Critical 15-Day Period: You must send the legal notice within 30 days of the cheque bouncing. This is a strict timeline.

   • Failure to Respond: If the debtor does not make payment within the 15-day period, the creditor can proceed with legal action.

4. Filing the Complaint

   • Post-Notice Action: If payment is not made within the 15 days, a criminal complaint can be filed within 30 days.

   • Jurisdiction: The complaint must be filed in the court where the cheque was presented for payment.

   • Necessary Documents: Attach relevant documents like:

     • The cheque,

     • Cheque return memo (issued by the bank),

     • Legal notice copy, and

     • Proof of dispatch of the notice (such as tracking details).

5. Common Mistakes to Avoid

   • Incorrect Address: Ensure the recipient’s address is correct to avoid delivery failures.

   • Improper Notice Format: The notice must be drafted following the specific requirements under Section 138.

   • Delay in Sending Notice: Delaying the notice beyond the 30-day limit may invalidate the claim.

   • Incomplete Documentation: Missing documents like the bank return memo or proof of dispatch can jeopardize the case.

6. Legal Implications of Non-Payment

   • Criminal Consequences: If found guilty, the accused faces a criminal penalty.

   • Cognizability: Section 138 offenses are cognizable, meaning the police can arrest the accused without a warrant.

   • Bail: If arrested, the accused may apply for bail, but it does not exempt them from the legal consequences.

7. Key Elements for a Strong Complaint

   • The complaint must include:

     • Details of the cheque (e.g., cheque number, date of issuance),

     • Bank return memo indicating dishonor,

     • Details of the legal notice, and

     • Proof of non-payment.

   • Ensure that the complaint clearly specifies that the payment demand was made and not fulfilled.

8. Defenses the Accused Might Raise

   • Insufficient Funds: The defendant may argue there were insufficient funds at the time of cheque presentation.

   • Cheque was Issued as Security: If the cheque was not issued for payment of a liability, it will not attract Section 138.

   • Stop Payment: If the cheque issuer has stopped payment due to a valid reason (such as fraud), the case may not be valid under Section 138.

9. Timelines and Legal Recourse

   • Complaint Filing: Must be done within 30 days of the 15-day notice period.

   • Court Process: Once the complaint is filed, the court may initiate summons to the accused and proceed with a trial.

   • Delay in Filing: If you miss the 30-day filing window, file a petition explaining the delay. Valid reasons (e.g., health issues, accidents) may be accepted by the court.

10. Defendant's Options Post-Complaint

    • Settlement: The accused may offer to settle the payment during the legal process, but settlement does not automatically dismiss the case.

    • Conviction: If the defendant is found guilty, they may be convicted with either imprisonment or fine.

---

Criminal Implications 

• Cognizability: A Section 138 offense is cognizable (police can arrest without warrant) and falls under quasi-criminal liability.

• Bail: Even though the offense is criminal, it is generally bailable, but courts may consider the nature of the crime.

• Importance of Compliance: Strict adherence to timing, document submission, and correct legal procedure is crucial for a successful outcome.

CASES

 Supreme Court and High Court Case Laws on Section 138 NI Act :

1. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (2003)

   • Issue: Whether a notice under Section 138 should be served to the drawer of the cheque before filing a complaint.

   • Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that a legal notice must be served within 30 days of the dishonor of the cheque. If the payment is not made within 15 days of receiving the notice, then the complaint can be filed.

2. M/s. Goa Plast (P) Ltd. v. M/s. Vasudev Corporation (2004)

   • Issue: The validity of a cheque issued as security and its applicability under Section 138.

   • Decision: The Supreme Court held that a cheque issued as security for a loan repayment, even though not for an actual sale or transfer, still falls under the purview of Section 138 if the cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds.

3. Narbada Devi Gupta v. Birendra Kumar Jaiswal (2003)

   • Issue: Validity of a post-dated cheque under Section 138.

   • Decision: The Supreme Court upheld that a post-dated cheque is valid for a claim under Section 138, and the offense would be considered after the dishonor of the cheque on its due date.

4. Suman Suri v. State of Haryana (2001)

   • Issue: The requirement of a legal notice in case of dishonored cheques.

   • Decision: The Supreme Court clarified that a legal notice is a precondition for filing a complaint under Section 138. If notice is not given, the complaint cannot be entertained.

5. Ravindra K. Gupta v. K.K. Verma (2004)

   • Issue: Whether the complaint filed under Section 138 after 15 days from the notice period is maintainable.

   • Decision: The court ruled that the complaint must be filed within 30 days of the notice period expiry. A delay beyond 30 days will make the complaint inadmissible.

6. Dalmia Cement Ltd. v. S.S. Upadhyay (2002)

   • Issue: Whether an accused can be prosecuted under Section 138 if the cheque is issued for non-payment of a debt.

   • Decision: The Supreme Court held that a cheque issued for a valid debt can be prosecuted under Section 138, and a defense claiming it as a gift or for a non-existing debt is invalid.

7. M.S. Narayana Menon v. State of Kerala (2006)

   • Issue: Whether a complaint can be filed against a company director under Section 138 when a cheque is dishonored.

   • Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that the director of a company can be held liable under Section 138, provided they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the time the offense was committed.

8. C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed (2007)

   • Issue: Whether civil liability can be converted into criminal liability under Section 138.

   • Decision: The Court clarified that Section 138 does not convert a civil liability into a criminal liability. The dishonor of the cheque is a criminal offense, but the claim is based on a valid debt.

9. V. Ramaswamy v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007)

   • Issue: Jurisdiction of courts under Section 138 when a cheque is presented across multiple jurisdictions.

   • Decision: The court held that the jurisdiction for the criminal complaint under Section 138 lies at the location where the cheque was presented for payment and where dishonor took place.

10. Suman Suri v. State of Haryana (2011)

• Issue: The need for proof of service of notice under Section 138.

• Decision: The court held that the complainant must show proof of service of the notice under Section 138. Without such evidence, the complaint would be considered invalid.

---

Insights from Key Cases:

1. Time Limits: Strict adherence to the 15-day notice period and the 30-day filing window is essential.

2. Jurisdiction: Complaints must be filed in the court where the cheque was presented and dishonored.

3. Liability: Directors of companies can be held personally liable if they are responsible for the dishonor of the cheque.

4. Cheque as Security: A cheque issued as security for payment still attracts Section 138 if it is dishonored due to insufficient funds.

5. Post-Dated Cheques: The due date for post-dated cheques is the key date for Section 138 proceedings.

6. Defenses: Arguments like stop-payment or insufficient funds can be raised, but the legal liability remains if the cheque was issued for a valid debt.